Response to the Press release by the Ministry of Finance

On 18^th August, Ministry of Finance issued a clarification about number of tax payers added post-demonetisation, hoping to set at rest the confusion – and skepticism – that had resulted from four different numbers being quoted by the prime minister, the finance minister, the Economic Survey and the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

Of course, these numbers of 56 lakhs, 5.4 lakhs, 91 lakhs and 33 lakhs as the new tax payers are quite confusing and perplexing. Finally the press release confessed that these numbers denote nothing but “different period and different type of taxpayers”. The maze that the Government has laid is literally tread for any factual unbiased analysis and comparison of these numbers. Even then, let me try to decode this puzzle. 

Number quoted in the Prime Minister’s Speech (56 lakhs)

First, let me first dissect the clarification given to the statement made by the Prime Minister. The clarification is as follows:

“The Prime Minister’s speech referred to the increase in number of e-filed Personal Income Tax Returns (ITRs) filed from 1st April, 2017 to 5th August, 2017 over the ITRs filed in corresponding period of earlier years. The data maintained by the IT Department shows that during 1st April, 2017 to 5th August, 2017, 2.79 crore e-returns of Individual taxpayers were received as against 2.23 crore e-returns received during 1st April, 2016 to 5th August, 2016. Thus, the additional ITRs received in 2017 works out to be 56 lakh. During the same period of 2015, 2.00 crore e-returns were received, meaning thereby, that in 2016, only 22 lakh (rounded off)) additional e-returns were received by the due date of filing. This data has already been put in public domain by CBDT’s Press Release dated 7th August, 2017.”

(Emphasis supplied)

First examine the Prime Minister's speech to see that exactly what he has said.

“The number of new taxpayers filing income tax returns from April 01 to August 05 is 56 lakhs while in the same period last year only 22 lakh filed the returns. In a way it has more than doubled. This is the result of our fight against black money.”

I am not seeing that anywhere in the above statement the Prime Minister is specifically comparing the e-returns as clarified by the Ministry of Finance, instead he is speaking about the new tax payers without qualifying them to e-returns. Also the CBDT press release dated 7^th August mentioned in yesterday's press release is also not mentioning about e-returns.

This is the same press release, which was carried my most of the newspapers on 8^th August with huge headlines showing that demonetisation finally earned a huge jump of 24% in the income tax returns. In my last blog post I dealt this issue in detail. As of now it is clarified that it is a comparison of the e-returns, hence let us compare the growth of e-filing for the last couple of years from the table provided in the Annual Report of the Finance Ministry (FY 2015-16, Page 228).

The Report explains that “Electronic filing of I-T returns over the internet picked up from AY 2006-07 and the number of returns filed electronically has risen from around 4 Lakh in Financial Year, 2006-07 to 341.73 Lakh in Financial Year 2014-15. In Financial Year, 2015-16, nearly 309.53 Lakh returns were received up to 31st December, 2015 as compared to 243.31 Lakh returns for same period in Financial Year 2014-15, representing a growth of around 27.22%.”

We can see from the above table that the growth of e-returns seen an year to year growth of 74%, 79%, 31% and 38.67%  during the last 4 financial years of Dr. Manmohan Singh’s UPA-2 (2010-2014). Now I leave to your judgment that whether the 25% hike in e-returns in last year, that too based on a selective period, can be attributed as something phenomenal!

Number quoted in the Economic Survey (5.4 lakhs)

This is the clarification given by Ministry of Finance about this number.

“The analysis given in Table-6 on page 22 of the Economic Survey (Vol.2) is based on the data for the period of 9th November to 31st March of 2016-17 and corresponding periods of last two financial years. Moreover, the growth in the number of taxpayers discussed in the Economic Survey is based on the number of new taxpayers assuming the previous year’s growth rate as the reference growth rate. On the other hand, the growth of Individual return-filers referred to in PM’s speech is with respect to new as well as old taxpayers. Thus, the data used in Economic Survey is different from data referred to in PM’s speech in respect of the period of filing as well as the type of taxpayers and the two are not comparable.”

This is one exercise done by Arvind Subramanian, Chief Economic Advisor, which can be close to the truth as far as the real growth in number of new tax payers are concerned. I have dealt this in detail in my last blog post. My take is if he has compared the new tax payers added during FY 2016-17 (80.7 lakhs) with the number added during FY 2014-15 (76.04 lakh), then the above number of 5.4 lakhs will further shrink!

Number quoted by the Finance Minister (91 lakhs)

The clarification by Ministry of Finance for this amazing number of 91 lakhs is as follows:

“The statement of the Finance Minister regarding addition of 91 lakh taxpayers to the tax-base referred to the total number of new returns filed during the entire financial year 2016-17 and therefore, it is neither comparable to the data in PM’s speech nor with the data in Economic Survey (different period and different type of taxpayers).” 

First of all most media reported that time, in unison that Finance Minister on May 17, 2017 then talked about the number of tax payers post demonetisation, not for the entire financial year as saying in the clarification now. This is evident from the news headlines of that day – Times of India, Huffinton Post, NDTV, Live Mint, New Indian Express, Deccan Chronicle, India Today & Zee News. – none of which the government controverted.

Another question is while the Economic Survey is speaking about the total number of tax payers for the entire financial year 2016-17 as 80.7 lakhs (See Para 1.85, Page 22, Economic Survey Vol.2) , then the new clarification of 91 lakhs pertaining to the same financial year does not hold water.  Both figures cannot be right!

Number given in the Rajya Sabha (33 lakhs)

Here it is clarified that total number of returns filed between 9.11.2016 to 31.03.2017 is 1.96 crores and it is compared with the same number of returns filed in the previous year during the same period, which comes to 1.63 crores. 

This growth too not something phenomenal when you compare the same period in earlier years. For data comparisons to be meaningful, we should look at the whole financial year rather than at data for a part of the year.

A final word

At the end of the day, there is only custodian for all income tax-related data and that is the CBDT. The board is the institution which has been providing these figures to the prime minister, the finance minister, the chief economic advisor, etc. Instead of waiting for all the data to come in and making a simple apples-with-apples comparison, why has it been throwing different numbers at the people? Is the idea to use data selectively in order to justify demonetiastion? This is the question that the CBDT must answer.